Dr. Gregory Gull’s book, provides a facile way of looking at the history of our current economics and why and how we need to change. If we want families, communities, and responsive government, we can no longer stay on a path that serves the economic structures and put humanity second. Dr. Gull’s book deals with difficult issues that the world is facing right now.
Robert Kesten
Executive Director Center for SCREEN-TIME Awareness
Dr. Gull’s book, It’s the EconomME, Stupid, is deceivingly easy to understand. Like a modern-day Socrates, Gull takes us through a crisply written dialogue with Adam Smith. … I believe this will become known as one of the Great Books of our time, and, like other paradigm-shifting authors…, , he gives us a thin volume, thick with meaning. It should be required reading for business leaders, students, journalists, and policymakers. It would remind us that Capitalism is a tool too often wielded in immature hands. The cycles of boom, hustle, bust then bailout are the result of lack of imagination and courage.
Dan Strongin
Business Coach ManageNaturally.com
As a business owner who has previously worked for multinational corporations and public bodies, I find It’s the EconoME, Stupid to be very relevant. It goes to the heart of what I am trying to create, which is a robust, long-term, sustain- able business. This book combines academic and intellectual rigor with basic common sense. It is not about quick fixes. The ideas that are explored and developed are valid at multiple levels. I recommend this book — not only to opinion formers and policymakers — but to the widest readership possible. My overall thought of the book is that it is of both great practical and academic significance, and offers a basis for progress. I believe a work like this is necessary to move us all forward.
John Timothy Beardsley
CEO JTB Consultants SDN BHD
This page has the following sub pages.

[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] providing labor to feed the economic system we must educate to develop human beings. Why not stop playing the game that is destroying all [...]
[...] we challenge our own thinking as well as that of those in authority—yes those who are contextualizing our situation—we will [...]
[...] reform our societal systems (e.g. economic, educational, governmental, etc.) we must critically think about the aim of each, questioning [...]
[...] are the implications? If we don’t like the experiences we are giving ourselves then we ought to challenge the ideas and vision we put into practice about what being human [...]
[...] exactly what the original architect of our economic system, Adam Smith, intended. The following excerpted dialogue amplifies this [...]
[...] springs forth. Why? It’s not that each person has come to the same conclusion after reflecting and thinking about it. Reflective and critical thinking were not involved at all! It was the mind securely attached [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] The demonstrating in Wisconsin—and the likelihood of the same in other states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania—is brought to us by our societal system of orientation. [...]
[...] need for a philosophical perspective in all human endeavors, particularly in business, education and government, should be clear. Yet [...]
[...] is deemed unimportant and unnecessary. And why is society’s orientation as it is? The egoistic economic system, which is grounded in and thus requires the belief that people are at base pain avoiding and [...]
[...] reaction speaks to is a fundamental change in the business of business. This change requires a new economics, one that aligns with and supports our human nature and not play upon our animal nature. [...]
[...] other systems (of government and education), rendering them ineffective, we must fundamentally change our economic system if we expect our reality to [...]
[...] the precepts of our economic system would have us believe otherwise (for the sake of maximizing our desire to consume) we are not mere [...]
[...] is not free and independent of everything, especially not society. Thus, at base, the conduct of business must be socially responsible. The concern for growth in profit alone is not enough! The living can’t continue to pollute its [...]
[...] of this was quite predictable considering the precept of our system of economics. That is, financial capitalism is a logical development from the notion that material [...]
[...] enabling the birth of something new and beneficial. Instead of an egoistic capitalism we need an ecological/evolutionary economics, one that rests on understanding our total ecology—having a concern for how we use both material [...]
[...] enabling the birth of something new and beneficial. Instead of an egoistic capitalism we need anecological/evolutionary economics , one that rests on understanding our total ecology–having a concern for how we use both [...]
[...] that has people disregarding each other’s as well as one’s own humanity. And as explained in It’s the econoMe stupid, grounding a system of economics on this fallacy can’t help but to negatively impact [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] Gilding is correct (and I think he is and the argument in It’s the Econome, Stupid explains why) then following Hagel will only accelerate us toward committing [...]
[...] if our system of government was a democracy and not a plutocracy? What if we’ve been structuring society and (our) life according to a fallacy? What if we aren’t as materially driven as the system of economics has led us to believe and [...]
[...] it is broken suggests that all that is needed is a little repair when in fact what is needed is critical thinking: It is a fundamentally flawed system that has infiltrated the very workings of [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] is not what happens: It’s a nice neat theory but nasty and messy when put into practice because it is a flawed theory—one that clearly requires the influence of imaginary helping [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]
[...] EconoME [...]